Posts

Showing posts from November, 2022

The Fallacy of Artificial General Intelligence: Microsoft's Recognition of the Limits of LLMs

  Microsoft released a research work last week [1] that claims that GPT-4 capabilities can be viewed as an early version of Artificial General Intelligence. The authors states that " the breadth and depth of GPT -4's capabilities, we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system. "  The researchers adopted the following definition of human Intelligence to reach this conclusion: " a very general mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience. ". According to the same paper, the definition was proposed in 1994 by a group of psychologists. Interestingly, the authors of the paper [1] acknowledges that the definition of human intelligence is somehow restrictive. They also acknowledge that some components of this definition are currently missing

My own number theory

Numbers are what makes the rich and the poor...  Numbers are what make good and bad… Numbers are everywhere and everything… They make us love numbers No matter if you don't have a number, borrow one, pick another; just give me a number No time to hear or listen; give me your number  Please don't blame me; I'm like you, a number  We are all added Or divided .....by other numbers Whenever we find a problem with a number, we define another number.... Scientists defined numbers, but if they knew the numbers would describe them, they would have eliminated the numbers But wait … they defined zero Zero is the hero But no one allows me to multiply it by these numbers… Oh dear, they make the disreality reflects numbers!!! What if we forget the numbers  No poor, no rich No thief or cheater To whom do I explain… Life and death are not numbers  Science, love, and humanity don’t know numbers  Work for life, not for numbers  Work for science not for numbers Get us out of the prison of nu

Division by zero is not infinity, it is undefined

We all learn at school that dividing by zero is infinity. This is, unfortunately not true. So, to explain why I'm going to use successive subtraction. But before that, let's see why most of us believe that division by zero is infinite. This belief comes from the fact that the division's result is producing huge numbers when the divisor converges to zero. So, for example, if m=a/b , we will obtain big values for m as b converges to zero.  Typically from a subtraction point of view, the result of any division operation ( m ) represents a number that we can multiply by the divisor and then subtract from the dividend to obtain a number (called remainder) that is less than the divisor. In arithmetic, we call this Euclidean division: a-m*b=r where r <b . Our objective is to find m that can produce a remainder ( r ) whose value is less than the divisor b . If we want now to divide by zero, the euclidean division will have the following form: a-m*0=r . The question boils down